🔗 Share this article

A Danish citizen has been convicted of sharing nude scenes from protected movies and TV series on the online site Reddit.

According to a law enforcement report reviewed by media outlets, the unnamed man shared 347 clips of explicit content in a subreddit he managed, which were then watched 4.2 million-plus times.

Danish authorities state he has been given a seven-month deferred jail term for copyright infringement.

Legal analysts explain the man was charged under a seldom-invoked provision in Danish intellectual property legislation, with the court ruling that by removing the footage out of their intended setting, the man had damaged the performers' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been found guilty of sharing more than 25 TB of copyrighted digital content.

From March 2022 to mid-2023, the user known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded adult clips including over 100 female performers.

He distributed them in the subreddit he was a administrator of.

Per the Danish copyright protection group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were prompted to request clips of particular actors.

In 2023, advocates filed the incident to the police on behalf of the affected artists, directors and producers, which resulted in the subreddit being shut down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, one of the performers whose nude content were circulated in the community, told Danish broadcasters at the time she felt there was a difference between being seen naked in a film and being shown on Reddit.

The actress stated the uploads amounted to "abuse".

'An important signal'

The defendant was arrested in September 2024 and pleaded guilty to the charges last month.

In a comment after the verdict, TRA head the organization's leader remarked the outcome sent an "important" message "that infringements of creators' rights have consequences".

The ruling is viewed as unique in the country for its use of the "ethical protections" clause of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an artist's work cannot be used in a way which violates their standing.

Copyright law specialist Dr Alina Trapova informed BBC News the legal matter was "unusual" for its emphasis on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them economically.

How the case could affect other countries is unclear.

But she said there may be "an increasing number of such cases" in the future with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the integrity of one's creative output might be compromised with greater ease".