🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had originated from go-betweens to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is treading a complex path since Iran does not want appear to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president claiming the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations employed their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Diplomats claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats said the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if discussions resume.

Trump in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be settled by combat operations. He said the assaults commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the final solution to settle disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and respect, they will get a answer in the same approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the struggle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We acquired multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to eliminate, stays intact. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have grown more resilient, more cohesive, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the face of this attack."