🔗 Share this article

Law enforcement agencies across the UK successfully lobbied to deploy a facial recognition system acknowledged as discriminatory against women, youths, and individuals from ethnic minority groups, after complaining that a less biased version produced a reduced number of investigative leads.

How the System Works

UK forces utilize the national police database to conduct searches using historical face recognition. This procedure involves matching a “probe image” of a suspect against a repository of more than 19 million mugshots to identify possible hits.

Acknowledged Discrimination

The Home Office conceded last week that the system was flawed. This acknowledgment came after a study by the government's National Physical Laboratory determined it misidentified Black and Asian people and women at much greater frequency than Caucasian males. The ministry stated it “took steps on the findings”.

“This raises the issue of whether facial recognition only becomes useful if users accept biases in race and gender. Convenience is a poor argument for disregarding basic freedoms.”

Known Issue

Internal documents reveal that this bias has been known about for over twelve months. Furthermore, law enforcement argued to overturn an initial decision that was designed to mitigate the problem.

Senior officers were notified of the system's bias in late 2024. The government-ordered laboratory study found the system was had a higher probability to suggest incorrect matches for images depicting women, individuals of Black ethnicity, and those aged 40 and under.

A Policy U-Turn

In reaction, the national police leadership body ordered that the confidence threshold required for potential matches be increased to a level where the bias was significantly reduced.

However, this decision was overturned the next month following complaints from police that the modified technology was producing fewer “investigative leads”. Internal records show the higher threshold cut the proportion of searches that yielded potential matches from over half to a mere under 15%.

Severe Disparities

Although the authorities refused to say what setting is currently used, the recent NPL study discovered the system could generate incorrect matches for women of Black heritage nearly a hundred times more often than for white women at specific configurations.

The ministry stated on these findings: “Our evaluation found that in a specific scenarios the algorithm is more likely to incorrectly include some demographic groups in its match reports.”

Operational Effectiveness vs. Bias

Outlining the impact of the brief increase to the system's accuracy setting, the police records state: “This adjustment significantly reduces the impact of discrimination across protected characteristics of ethnicity, generation and sex but had a significant negative impact on police efficiency”. The documents add that forces argued that “a once effective tactic now delivered outcomes of questionable value”.

Wider Implementation Proposals

Meanwhile, the UK administration has launched a two-and-a-half-month public review on its proposals to expand the use of biometric scanning systems. The minister for police the relevant minister has labeled the technology as the “most significant advance since genetic fingerprinting”.

Expert and Oversight Concerns

Abimbola Johnson, chair of the independent scrutiny and oversight board for the police race action plan, commented: “There was scant discussion in race action plan meetings of the facial recognition rollout despite clear relevance with the plan’s concerns.

“These revelations demonstrate once again that the anti-racism commitments policing has undertaken via the race action plan are failing to be integrated into broader operations. Our reports have warned that new technologies are being rolled out in a landscape where racial disparities, inadequate oversight and poor data collection already persist.

“All deployment of facial recognition must meet strict national standards, be subject to external review, and prove it diminishes rather than exacerbates racial disparity.”

Official Statement

A government representative said: “We treat the conclusions of the study seriously and we have implemented changes. A new algorithm has been independently tested and acquired, which has demonstrated no measurable discrimination. It will be trialled in the coming months and will be undergo evaluation.

“Our priority is protecting the public. This revolutionary tool will assist officers to apprehend and prosecute offenders. There is officer review in each stage of the process and no further action would be pursued without specialist personnel meticulously examining the output.”